Showing posts with label Chekov. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chekov. Show all posts

Friday, May 29, 2026

Uncle Vanya

This summer, there are two free outdoor productions of Anton Chekhov's Uncle Vanya. Last night, I saw the first of them to begin performances, Hudson Classical Theater Company's staging by the Soldiers' and Sailors' Monument in Riverside Park. I can't speak for the other production that hasn't opened yet, but this one is definitely worth seeing.

Hudson Classical has done some great work in recent years, including Henrik Ibsen's The Lady From the Sea, William Shakespeare's Coriolanus, and Richard Brinsley Sheridan's The School for Scandal. This is their 23rd season presenting summer theatre, and Uncle Vanya is the 80th play they've produced. Audience members sit on the stone steps of the Monument, but fortunately there are cushions.

The unique setting adds to this production, since there is a natural backdrop of trees as the characters discuss the disappearing forests of Russia. Dr. Astrov, played by Jeff Dylan Garrett, speaks eloquently of his plans to restore nature to its former grandeur. Unfortunately, the beautiful Yelena, played by Silvia Bond, seems incapable of understanding him. Astrov remains fixed on Yelena, in spite of the attention paid to him by her stepdaughter young Sonya, played by Charlotte Nichols.

At the center of this whirling cast of characters is Sonya's depressed Uncle Vanya, played by Dan McVey. Vanya is also in love with Yelena, though she remains married to Professor Serebryakov, who is played in all his annoying petulance by John L. Payne. The professor, who writes virtually unread books about Realism and Naturalism without understanding a bit about art, remains to this day a biting attack on the inanity of certain academics.

Nicholas Martin-Smith directs the production to run swiftly from scene to scene in an intermission-free performance that gets to the heart of Chekhov's text with such rapidity the audience doesn't mind the cramped legroom on the Monument steps. The show runs through June 21st, so see it before it closes!

Friday, January 23, 2026

Into the Light

Marc Castle's new play Into the Light (which I'm directing) opens tonight, so get your tickets while you can!

In addition to writing the play, Marc Castle is starring as Sol, a newly departed soul who arrives in the hereafter only to find that none of the people waiting for him there are the ones he expected. Marc's previous plays have been done at EST, the Neighborhood Playhouse, and La Mama. In another age, he toured as a child actor in the first national company of the musical Camelot. He later wrote about it in his one-man show One Brief Shining Moment.

Acting opposite Marc is Terri Campion, who also wrote My Girl, one of the one-acts going up together with Into the Light. She's perhaps best known for her novel, Our Lady of Perpetual Sorrow, but she also has a long list of acting credits, including Hetty in Alice Gerstenberg's Overtones at Metropolitan Playhouse and Clytemnestra in Euripides's Iphigenia in Aulis with Greeks & Company.

Ralph Pachoda appears in the play as Jake, an old acquaintance of Sol's. Ralph is a regular at ARTC's weekly developmental workshop, but he also has had a long career as a classical actor. He appeared Off-Broadway as Creon opposite James Earl Jones in Oedipus by Sophocles. He also did a national tour of Lanford Wilson's Talley's Folly with Maryanne Plunkett.

Rounding out the cast is Jeannie Dalton, who plays Sol's mother Goldie. She's a brilliant comic actress who has played everything from Dunyasha in Anton Chekhov's The Cherry Orchard to Raina in Bernard Shaw's Arms and the Man to Puck in Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream to Fanny in Eric Overmyer's On the Verge to Elmire in Moliere's Tartuffe. 

After tonight, we have only three more performances as part of the Two by Four festival playing at HB Studio's 124 Bank Street Theater. We're on again tomorrow, January 24th at 7pm, Sunday the 25th at 3pm, and then our final performance is on Tuesday the 27th at 7pm. I hope to see you there!

Friday, September 27, 2024

The Fourth Sister

I just got back from seeing Jez Butterworth's new play The Hills of California, a rather Chekhovian examination of hope, heartbreak, and faded dreams.

In Chekhov's The Three Sisters, Masha broods and lashes out, much like Gloria, played by Leanne Best in Butterworth's play. Masha's sister Olga takes care of the family, though she misses out on any chance for love, as is true of Butterworth's Jill, played by Helena Wilson. The youngest sister in Chekhov's play, Irine, tries to maintain a sunny disposition even as everything falls apart, rather like Ruby, played by Ophelia Lovibond in The Hills of California.

But what if there had been a fourth sister, one who actually escaped life in the provinces and finally made it all the way to Moscow... or perhaps California? This provides a departure from Chekhov's set-up, and the fourth sister in Butterworth's play is a looming presence throughout, even when she isn't on stage. Her name is Joan, and she is beautifully played by Olivier-winning actress Laura Donnelly, known to many as Amalia True from the television show The Nevers.

Why Joan has been away so long and is only returning to the family home in Blackpool now that their mother is dying is a central question in the play. Butterworth hints at the answer in a series of scenes flashing back twenty-one years earlier to when the four girls formed a singing quartet organized by their mother Veronica. Donnelly plays Veronica in these flashbacks, while the four girls are played by younger actors who blend their voices harmoniously in a series of musical numbers.

By the end, we do get a certain answer to the mystery of Joan's long absence, but in true Chekhovian fashion, the play unwinds anti-climactically rather than ending with a bang like Butterworth's previous play Jerusalem. The performances are wonderful, and the play is definitely worth seeing, especially if you long to see Russian melancholy transferred to a declining resort town in England.

Wednesday, March 30, 2022

Birthday Candles

Last week, I saw Roundabout's production of Noah Haidle's play Birthday Candles starring Debra Messing. The play follows the life of a Michigan woman one birthday at a time, as she progresses from being a teenager to being an elderly woman.

The piece is reminiscent of plays by Thornton Wilder in that it tries to universalize the human experience, and in particular the experience of the American Family. In many of Wilder's plays, however, like The Skin of Our Teeth, the universal is placed in dialogue with the political and the technological.

What makes Birthday Candles different is its total rejection of political and technological change. Generally, if a person lives for nearly a hundred years, that individual will see depressions, wars, protests, and the advent of new technologies like commercial airline travel, space exploration, and personal computers.

If Ernestine--the protagonist of Birthday Candles--experiences these things, they don't seem to affect her very much. She goes on baking cakes in the same oven her mother used, using the same methods, never changing much of anything. If the characters in The Skin of Our Teeth exist in a timeless New Jersey, it is still a New Jersey shaped by global events, to which the characters in Birthday Candles seem oblivious.

That isn't to say that it isn't a good play, but it feels oddly detached from the world around us. Even when basing a play on Greek myth, like with The Alcestiad, Wilder always engaged with the events going on around the globe while he was writing. Here we are, going through our own turbulent times, and the theatre on display on Broadway is currently taking a very different approach, at least in the case of Birthday Candles.

There are some very strong performances though, particularly by Susannah Flood, who played Dunyasha in Roundabout's previous production of The Cherry Orchard by Anton Chekhov. In Birthday Candles, Flood plays both Ernestine's mother Alice, and her daughter Madeline, and later Ernie, another descendant of the ever-older Ernestine.

Birthday Candles is playing until May 29th, so get your tickets if you're interested in seeing it.

Saturday, October 19, 2019

Cyrano, My Love

I just saw Cyrano, My Love, a wonderful new movie written and directed by Alexis Michalik that imagines how Edmond Rostand might have come to write his classic play Cyrano de Bergerac.

Theresa Rebeck gave her own account of Cyrano's creation in Bernhardt/Hamlet, one of my favorite plays to open in New York last year. Michalik's take is not as psychologically believable, but it's not supposed to be. Instead, it is a wild, theatrical romp through the backstage shenanigans of what was predicted to be a disaster, but ended up becoming one of the most beloved plays of the French theatre.

Thomas Solivérès plays Rostand, a neo-romantic poet whose recent play La Princesse Lointaine was a flop in spite of starring the divine actress Sarah Bernhardt. He sets out to write a play for the comic actor Constant Coquelin (played by Olivier Gourmet), who has his own troubles with the Comédie-Française. While Coquelin tries to sell the play to backers, there's only one problem: it isn't written yet.

In scenes reminiscent of Shakespeare in Love, Rostand stumbles upon the inspiration he needs. This is largely with help from a young costumer who becomes his muse, even though (as in Cyrano) she thinks she is in love with a handsome actor whose letters to her are all penned by Rostand. Sometimes we get scenes right out of the play, only performed by Rostand and his contemporaries in the film. And speaking of film, a short by the Méliès brothers even makes an appearance, leading Rostand to despair that the theatre itself might soon become obsolete.

Much of the fun of Cyrano, My Love comes from brief appearances of historical figures of the era, including a consumptive Anton Chekov, waiting patiently downstairs at a Paris brothel while a certain Constantin is indulging with one of the hostesses. The movie also makes Rostand frenemies with the farce writer Georges Feydeau, who is shown getting ready to open another crowd pleaser as Cyrano is also in rehearsals. Indeed, the movie at times seems more like a crazy Feydeau farce than the love-sick heroic comedy that made Rostand famous.

None of that really matters, though, since the film is so delightful. When Cyrano first opened at the Théâtre de la Porte Saint-Martin in 1897, the audience called the actors back for curtain call after curtain call, and when I saw the movie at the Angelika Film Center, the audience likewise burst into applause. If you get a chance to see it, you won't be disappointed.


Sunday, April 15, 2018

Seagullmachine

Last night, I went to the first preview of The Assembly's new piece, SEAGULLMACHINE, at La MaMa. According to the company's website:

The Assembly’s newest performance smashes together two iconic riffs on the Hamlet story – Anton Chekhov’s The Seagull and Heiner Muller’s Hamletmachine – combining theatrical realism, immersive staging, live video, poetry, comedy and tragedy to excavate the legacy of 20th-century drama in the light of the present-day, and ask: What’s the good of making theater anyway?

If you're expecting a full-on mash-up of The Seagull and Hamletmachine, however, that's not what this is. The audience is led into the Ellen Stewart Theatre at La MaMa, past the risers where they would usually sit, into a specially built mini-theater, with a three-quarters-round seating area at the back of the regular stage.

Sitting here for the first half of the show, they watch what is a pretty traditional production of the first three acts of The Seagull. There are a few avant-garde touches, such as a chrome-looking sculpture being used for the seagull that Konstantin shoots, and some video monitors showing the area behind the stage, but for the most part, it's not too different from any production of The Seagull you would expect to see in the Village these days.

After the intermission break, the audience returns to their seats for the final act of The Seagull, which is performed in roughly the same style, until we get to the last line, and the performance transforms into Muller's Hamletmachine. The two plays might seem to be an odd pairing, but the pieces are both variations on Hamlet. As a program note for the performance argues:

Both plays are, of course, haunted by Shakespeare's Hamlet. In The Seagull, a young artist-intellectual unsettled by his mother's new partner and his own troubled relationship, utilizes a boldly experimental play-within-a-play as a weapon against the mores of his parents' generation. In Hamletmachine, the figure of Hamlet reckons with the failures of his art and idealism to transform the world, and endeavors to destroy the theater once and for all.

Muller's Hamletmachine is notoriously open to interpretation in terms of how it should be performed, but The Assembly uses this to their advantage, having Konstantin (Jax Jackson) double as the Hamlet figure, Nina (Layla Khosh) as Ophelia, Trigorin (Ben Beckley) as Claudius, and Arkadina (Nehassaiu deGannes) as Gertrude.

For the end of the show, the audience is also led out of the mini-theater where they had been sitting into a space where the performance can truly become immersive. Wear comfortable shoes, and don't be afraid to leave your bags and coats at your seat. (They'll let you get back to them. I promise!)

SEAGULLMACHINE is running until May 5th. If you're interested in going, check out The Assembly's website here:

The Assembly

Friday, November 11, 2016

A Lesson from the Orchard

This week I was teaching a script analysis class, and we were picking apart Anton Chekov's The Cherry Orchard. It was interesting on Monday to discuss the objectives of different characters in acts one and two.

And then Tuesday happened.

I walked into class on Wednesday, and my students looked shell-shocked. They didn't know what had happened to their country. They didn't know what to think of this unprecedented vote. They needed to discuss what happened, but they had no idea how.

"Alright," I said. "We're going to talk. We're going to talk about something very, very important. We're going to talk about The Cherry Orchard."

They all stared at me. Really? This was what we were going to talk about today?

"What is The Cherry Orchard about?" I asked them.

There were blank stares.

"Okay," I said. "I'll make it easy on you. What happens in Act III? What is everyone doing in Act III?"

"Um... they're having a party," one student said.

"That's right," I said. "They're having a big ball with a band and lots of dancing. Meanwhile, what's happening?"

"The cherry orchard is being sold," another student said.

"And did they expect it to be sold?"

"No," said a student. "They thought they could never lose it."

"Yup. All the signs were there. And yet, they thought they'd never lose the orchard. It had been theirs for hundreds of years, so naturally, it would always be theirs. They could never lose the cherry orchard. Yet they did. The thing they thought could never happen, happened. And in one moment, the entire world they knew was gone."

Roundabout Theatre Company's production of The Cherry Orchard is currently playing until December 4th, and if you haven't seen it yet, you should. The play reminds us that nothing is inevitable. We can try to go along in life as if the world will always be the way it always was. That's what the family in The Cherry Orchard does. But they lose the orchard. They lose everything.

The play premiered at the Moscow Art Theatre in 1904. Ten years later, Europe was enveloped in a World War. Three years after that, Russia fell to the Bolsheviks. Were all those delightful characters in Chekov's play real people, they would probably all have been dead within a few decades after the loss of their orchard.

And so we, too, America, have gone on thinking that nothing could ever change. But it can. And while we danced at the ball, the land might have been sold out from beneath our very feet. And what is to come might be even worse.

I hate you, Chekov. I wish you weren't right.

Saturday, October 15, 2016

The Cherry Orchard on Broadway

This afternoon, I saw the Roundabout Theatre Company's production of The Cherry Orchard. An all-star cast (headed by Diane Lane) does a competent job with Chekhov's last and greatest play, and made me nostalgic for my college days, when I played Yepikhodov in a student production at Drew University.

Lane plays Madame Ranevskaya, a once wealthy landowner returning from Paris just in time to see her estate put up for auction. Her brother Gaev (played wonderfully by John Glover) has a million ideas and no idea for how to save the family home. Her daughter Anya (played by Tavi Gevinson, who did a great job earlier this year in The Crucible) realizes everything is going wrong, yet that doesn't stop her from falling in love with a penniless student.

But enough about them! How was the real star of the show, Yepikhodov? Quinn Mattfeld plays the comical bookkeeper, and I enjoyed his performance from the moment he came in with his squeaky boots. Now, I'm not saying he was as good as I was in the role, but I did feel for him when he was scorned by his love Dunyasha (a delightfully awkward Susannah Flood). The party in the third act was transformed into a masked ball, and Yepikhodov's costume was particularly outrageous. (You'll have to see the play for yourself to find out how he was dressed!)

Other fine performances are given by Chuck Cooper (whom I last saw in Amazing Grace) as Simeonov-Pischik, Joel Grey as Firs, Celia Keenan-Bolger as Varya, and Harold Perrineau as Lopakhin. The adaptation was penned by Stephen Karam, best known for writing The Humans. If you're interested in seeing the show, check out Roundabout's website here:

Roundabout Theatre Company


Monday, May 25, 2015

Maurice Maeterlinck

Poets like Stéphane Mallarmé, Rainer Maria Rilke, and William Butler Yeats all admired the Belgian Symbolist playwright Maurice Maeterlinck. So did break-through dramatists, including August Strindberg, Anton Chekov, and Alfred Jarry.  It's a pity we don't see more of his plays performed today.

Maeterlinck wrote mostly in obscurity, until 1890, when the critic Octave Mirbeau wrote a review in Le Figaro declaring Maeterlinck's first play, Princess Maleine, one of the greatest masterpieces ever written. In Mirbeau's words: "Maeterlinck has given us the most ingenious and extraordinary work of these times, and also the most naïve, comparable, and dare I say it, superior in beauty to what is most beautiful in Shakespeare."

That type of hyperbole sounds ridiculous today, as it did to many people in 1890. However, in October of that year, Paul Fort (director of the Théâtre Mixte, soon to become the Théâtre d'Art) requested Maeterlinck's permission to stage Princess Maleine. Maeterlink instead granted André Antoine at the Théâtre Libre the rights to the play, but it was not produced during the playwright's lifetime.  In fact, the first performance of Princess Maleine by professional actors was not until 1962.

Paul Fort instead produced two of Maeterlinck's one-act plays, The Intruder in May of 1891, and then The Blind later that year. Greater fame came with Pelléas et Mélisande, published in 1892 and first performed on May, 17 1893, under the direction of Fort's protégé, Aurélien Lugné-Poe. The work is highly literary. Mallarmé said that "Pelléas et Mélisande, on a stage, exhales the delight of the page."

This work came to exemplify the Symbolist movement. According to Yeats, Symbolism "never mentions an external thing except to express the state of the soul."  Like all great Symbolist works, the play is noted not so much for what it shows, but for what it leaves out. The audience becomes a part of the work, having to supply that which is missing in the text.

Maeterlinck's works have inspired numerous composers, including Claude Debussy, Jean Sibelius, Gabriel Fauré, Paul Dukas, Anton Webern, and Sergei Rachmaninov.  Though Debussy's opera is the most famous musical adaptation of Pelléas et Mélisande, Fauré debuted his incidental music for the play years earlier, during the piece's London premiere at the Prince of Wales Theatre in 1898. Though the entire score is lovely, the highpoint for me is the "Song of Mélisande" from Act III.

The song takes place during the most famous scene of the play, as Mélisande leans out the window of a tower and Pelléas caresses her hair. The original song Maeterlinck had written for the piece wasn't working in the original Paris production. He instead gave about thirty poems to the actress playing Mélisande, and asked her to pick one.

She ended up choosing "Les trios soeurs aveugles." Maeterlinck asked the young composer Gabriel Fabre to set the piece to music, which he did to great acclaim. When Fauré wrote music for the English production, however, he used the translation done by Jack Mackail. It goes like this:

          The King's three blind daughters
          Sit locked in a hold.
          In the darkness their lamps
          Make a glimmer of gold.
          Up the stair of the turret
          The sisters are gone.
          Seven days they wait there
          And the lamps they burn on.
          What hope? says the first,
          And leans o'er the flame.
          I hear our lamps burning.
          O yet if he came!
          O hope! says the second,
          Was that the lamp's flare,
          Or a sound of low footsteps?
          The Prince on the stair!
          But the holiest sister
          She turns her about:
          O no hope now forever --
          Our lamps are gone out.

Maeterlinck was not without his critics. Camille Mauclair praised Percy Bysshe Shelley, Auguste Villiers de l'Isle-Adam, and Richard Wagner for work that is truly dramatic, but he left out Maeterlinck, finding his plays too philosophical.  Such criticism, however, did not stop Maeterlinck from winning the 1911 Nobel Prize for Literature.

Thursday, July 31, 2014

Notes on Realist Drama

The Failure of '48

In 1848, the Romantic spirit erupted in revolutions throughout Europe. Though some fighting had already begun in Sicily, the upheavals began in earnest in February with a revolt in France that toppled the moderate King Louis Philippe and established a French Republic for the first time since the ascension of Napoleon. Revolutions soon swept through Italy, Germany, Denmark, and the Austrian Empire. The Irish rose up against British rule, and England itself narrowly escaped revolution when a protest of more than 100,000 people in London ended with a peaceful petition for greater reform.

One after another, however, the revolutions collapsed. Pope Pius IX, once viewed as a potential champion of Italian independence, sided with reactionaries, setting back the unification of Italy by more than two decades. Czar Nicholas I came to the aid of the Austrian empire and sent hundreds of thousands of troops who aided in imposing martial law. Polish fighters failed miserably in their attempt to resurrect their country, which had been partitioned in the eighteenth century. Across Germany, scores of uprisings collapsed, and liberals went into exile, many of them fleeing to the United States. A year that began with such hope for change ended with many progressives falling into despair.

Though moderate reforms sometimes gained ground, the forces of conservatism largely restored the status quo, often with great bloodshed. Even France's new republic did not last long. Louis-Napoléon Bonaparte, a nephew of the former emperor, staged a coup in 1851, ending constitutional rule. He later crowned himself emperor, taking the name Napoleon III out of deference to Napoleon's son who never actually ruled. Instead of moving forward, history seemed to be comically inverting itself.  The political change young intellectuals across the continent had hoped for seemed an illusion.

In one of the last uprisings of the movement, the people of Dresden rose up against the King of Saxony in 1849. Among then was the young composer Richard Wagner. Banished after the failure of the revolt, Wagner wrote that the revolution must be carried out by other means. Not only Wagner, but artists of all kinds turned to the theatre as a means to change society in ways that arms and violence had failed. The Romantic dreaming of the past half century had ended in ruins, so many people believed the theatre should return to cold, hard facts, presented as realistically as possible.

The Box Set

One of the most important elements of the new, more realistic aesthetic of the theatre was the box set. The actress and theatre manager Lucia Elizabeth Vestris, better known as Madame Vestris, first introduced London audiences to this new technique of stage design in 1832 at the Olympic Theatre. The box set presents a room with a floor, ceiling, and three fixed walls, as if it were a real room with an imaginary fourth wall removed. The side walls and ceiling typically slope back away from the audience, so a box set is not an exact reproduction of a room, but it comes close. A few theatres in Europe had experimented with lashing together a few flats to create something approximating a box set, but the designs introduced by Vestris outdid anything that had been seen previously.

Together with her husband, the actor Charles Mathews, Vestris later took over the Covent Garden Theatre. That was where she introduced even more elaborate box sets for the 1841 premiere of London Assurance, a comedy by the Irish playwright Dion Boucicault. The play frequently calls for the actors to speak directly to the audience, a technique that later became known as "breaking the fourth wall." London Assurance only has one setting per act, a tradition the box set helped to solidify. While backdrops could be quickly lifted up into a theatre's fly space, box sets were cumbersome to change, meaning scene changes were often limited to intermissions.

After finding success with London Assurance, Boucicault worked on both sides of the Atlantic, continuing to write plays that exploited elaborate set designs. He adapted the French play The Poor of Paris as The Poor of New York, sometimes known as The Streets of New York, which debuted in 1857. Boucicault reset the play during a recent financial crisis and used place names that were familiar to New Yorkers. The climactic scene took place in a tenement in Five Points, the worst neighborhood in the city. The building spectacularly went up in flames on stage in full view of the audience.

Returning to England, Boucicault changed all of the local references and presented the play in Liverpool as The Poor of Liverpool, and later in London as The Streets of London. Rewriting plays to suit the tastes of local audiences became a hallmark of Boucicault's drama. In 1859, on the eve of the U.S. Civil War, he wrote the slavery melodrama The Octoroon, which managed to win popularity with Northerners and Southerners alike. The plot involves a white man in love with the title character, who is one-eighth black and legally a slave. In the U.S., many people considered such a "mixed" relationship unthinkable, so the heroine tragically died in the end. British audiences had no such qualms, so in 1861 he presented the play in London with a new, happy ending.

While Boucicault was busy writing and rewriting plays based on spectacle, Vestris quietly built up her own theatrical style. She banished the public from actors' dressing rooms and moved curtain times earlier so families could attend. Both of these reforms made the theatre more respectable. Even more importantly, she insisted on realistic sets, so that, in the words of her actor husband, "Drawing rooms were fitted up like drawing rooms." Other theatre artists praised her for her scrupulous attention to detail that helped to perfect a new style of theatrical illusion. However, Vestris could only do so much with hackney plays by the likes of Boucicault. For true realism, the theatre needed more than just box sets.

The Well-Made Play

By the middle of the nineteenth century, many playwrights, especially in France, were championing a tighter, more streamlined form of drama in which logic dictated the plot rather than a desire for spectacular stage effects. The French dramatist Eugéne Scribe set the standard for these new plays with his 1842 comedy The Glass of Water. Like many Romantic dramas, the play is set in an earlier historical epic, but instead of presenting a sweeping history drama, as Victor Hugo and Alexandre Dumas had done, Scribe reduced the affairs of nations to trivialities. What is more, he had the entire plot hang upon the seemingly minor act of the queen asking for a glass of water. Because the plots of Scribe and his followers were so tightly constructed, their works became known as well-made plays.

Sometimes, well-made plays took on important social issues. This was the case of the 1852 drama Camille by Dumas' son, who is known as Alexandre Dumas, fils. Camille tells the tragic story of a virtuous courtesan in love with a young man. She leaves him for his own good, but the two reunite by the end, when she dies of consumption (tuberculosis). Giuseppe Verdi adapted the play as the opera La Traviata, which opened the following year.

Camille questions conventional morality, but more often well-made plays confirmed the status quo. This was the case of the1855 play Olympe's Marriage by Émile Augier. Angier's play inverts the story of Camille, making the courtesan a scheming villainess. In the finale, a nobleman shoots the sinful woman in righteous indignation, declaring that God is his judge. For decades, these more conventional dramas dominated the stage. Even when important issues like slavery arose, such as in the spectacular stage adaptations of Harriet Beecher Stowe's novel Uncle Tom's Cabin, virtuous and villainous characters remained clearly demarcated as a way to help the audience enjoy the action rather than having to think seriously about complex issues.

Well-made plays frequently emphasized important stage props, as was the case in A Scrap of Paper, the 1860 comedy by Victorien Sardou. Sardou's characters seem less like people and more like cogs in a machine as they relentlessly chase the titular scrap of paper, a lost love letter, throughout the play, nearly burning it, throwing it out the window, and using it as blackmail. Sardou later wrote the play Tosca as a vehicle for the actress Sarah Bernhardt. As the play's protagonist was an opera singer, the composer Giacomo Puccini logically turned the piece into a popular opera. In spite of Sardou's popularity, however, some found his plots to be too neatly constructed, and the critic (and later playwright) George Bernard Shaw derided such plays, coining the ridiculous word Sardoodledom to connote a mechanically contrived and trivial play.

The German playwright Gustav Freytag wrote few lasting plays of merit, but he composed one of the most important manuals on how to construct a well-made play. In his 1863 book The Technique of the Drama, Freytag laid out a prescriptive structure for plots. Known as Freytag's Pyramid, this structure begins with exposition, in which the audience receives important background information, often through unlikely conversations between minor characters. The exposition is followed by rising action, in which the play's excitement builds toward the climax, which is the peak of the audience's interest. After the climax comes falling action in which the chief conflict unravels. The play then ends with the final resolution, which Freytag described using the French term dénoument. Though Freytag's plays never caught on, his dramatic theory had a long-lasting impact on later writers.

The Total Work of Art

In 1849, following the failed Dresden uprising, the young revolutionary and composer Richard Wagner published a long essay entitled "The Artwork of the Future." Wagner had already established a reputation with such operas as The Flying Dutchman, but the essay looked forward to a new art form that would go beyond the music-centered world of traditional opera. He advocated a new form of "music drama" which would be a "Gesamtkunstwerk" or "total work of art" arising out of the collective consciousness of "the people." Dance, tone, and poetry would all become one. There would no longer be separate arts, but one art, uniting all the others in a single vision.

Wagner tried to put his ideas into practice by writing both the music and lyrics of a massive four-opera cycle known as The Ring of the Nibelungen and then attempting to stage all four operas himself. Based loosely on Norse mythology, the opera's showed the gods building their homeland of Valhalla, disputing with one another, witnessing the rise of a hero, and then ultimately being destroyed, as Valhalla goes up in flames. To contain this epic drama, Wagner envisioned a special festival house designed specifically for its performance. Gaining the support of King Ludwig II of Bavaria, Wagner finally got his theatre, and in 1876 he staged the entire cycle in a specially designed opera house in the town of Bayreuth. No one had ever seen anything like it.

The Bayreuth Festival Theatre was purposefully built with few ornaments so as not to distract the audience from the stage. Wagner made sure the seats were laid out in a democratic fashion with no galleries or box seats, so that everyone got a good view of the action. A special double proscenium made the stage appear further back than it actually was, and a recessed orchestra pit created what Wagner called a "mystic gulf" between the stage and the audience. Advances in lighting allowed Wagner to place the audience in complete darkness, something that had never been done in the past. Lavish costumes and sets transported the scene to a realm that was mythic and magical, but he had each detail crafted with painstaking realism.

Today, the Bayreuth Festival continues to operate, bringing tens of thousands of people to the theatre every summer. Though many of Wagner's dreams never materialized precisely as he envisioned them, he has had a profound impact on the theatre. Wagner helped to codify the separation of the audience from the action of the play, solidifying the metaphorical "fourth wall." He also introduced technical innovations in lighting, sets, and theatre design that became standard practice in the late nineteenth century. Most importantly, he showed how powerful theatre could be when all elements, words, music, acting, lighting, set and costume design, together worked toward a common artistic vision.

Wagner was not the only theatre artist to work towards such a vision, or even the only one in Germany. Unlike Wagner, Georg II, the Duke of Saxe-Meiningen, had no need for noble patronage, as he was a noble himself, taking over a powerful duchy in 1866 upon the abdication of his father. The Duke took over the Meiningen Ensemble and introduced numerous reforms aimed at making plays more realistic and historically accurate. He had seen the antiquarian productions of Shakespeare that Charles Kean had staged in London, and the Duke wanted to take Kean's verisimilitude to a new level. For eight years, he maintained a vigorously trained company dedicated to performing a repertory of classic plays.

In 1874, the duke took his plays on the road, exhibiting his cutting-edge productions first in Berlin, then through Russia, Sweden, Austria, Denmark, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Britain. The company gave thousands of performances throughout Europe, frequently putting local theatres to shame. Audiences were shocked not just by the historical accuracy of the sets and costumes, but by the way the ensemble of actors worked together as a unit. There were no stars in the Duke's company. When an actor was not cast in a leading role, he or she had to appear onstage in a minor part or as a supernumerary, one person in a crowd of others.

Those crowd scenes particularly impressed audiences. In the Duke's production of Julius Caesar, crowds wearing Roman togas acted not as a mob, but as a host of individual characters, each with his or her own unique blocking. The effect was a single, unified production, but with each element, each action, planned out to serve the play. Because the company traveled widely over the course of 16 years, theatre artists from all over Europe saw the productions, and they were invariably influenced by what they saw. A generation of new artists then sought to create a new type of theatre, one that, like Wagner's, was dominated by a single, all-controlling vision.

Ibsen

The first practitioner of what we now think of as modern drama was also one of the last of the Romantics. The Norwegian poet Henrik Ibsen was living in a self-imposed exile in Italy when in 1865 he wrote a verse tragedy called Brand about an uncompromising Christian minister. Ibsen never meant for the piece to be performed, but its inherent theatricality led to its premiere two years later in Sweden and to Ibsen's gaining wide spread acclaim. The same year that Brand received its first performance, Ibsen wrote an even more ambition verse drama, Peer Gynt, about a charismatic con man who is the opposite of the protagonist in Brand. Though Peer Gynt was far too long to be performed in its entirety, from the 1870s on it became a staple of the international repertoire, aided by incidental music Edvard Grieg composed especially for the piece.

After writing the two greatest verse dramas in his native language, Ibsen abandoned writing plays in verse and composed his next two plays, The League of Youth and Emperor and Galilean, in prose. The first was a satire on the small-mindedness of modern politicians while the later was a sprawling historical drama about the conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Roman Empire. Having outgrown Romanticism, Ibsen had not yet found a new way to talk about the important issues of humanity in a way that spoke to the concerns of the modern era. Moving to Munich, Ibsen wrote The Pillars of Society, a play that feels at home in a box set and draws upon many elements of the well-made play. However, it brought together elements of comedy, melodrama, and satire into a coherent whole, presenting a unified vision of the corruption at the heart of the modern world.

More than any other author, Ibsen became associated with the new style of Realism. In Ibsen's hands, Realism did not just present the world as it appeared on the surface, it also probed deeper into the underlying issues of society in general. Ibsen portrayed characters with complex psychologies, who seemed like actual people one might meet in real life. At the same time, these characters groped with the fundamental issues of human existence--life, death, love, injustice--in a way that made them rise above the banality of everyday life. Though Ibsen's world appears as real as our own, audiences are acutely aware of the fact that there is more on stage than meets the eye.

Ibsen's 1879 play A Doll House exemplified this new aesthetic, and simultaneously caused a considerable uproar. The play portrays a middle-class woman who abandons her husband and children, slamming the door behind her. Some actresses refused to perform the ending as written, and Ibsen grudgingly wrote an alternative ending in order to forestall hack writers from coming up with their own, even more watered-down endings. Critics attacked Ibsen's next play, Ghosts, even more fiercely, calling it "a dirty act done publicly," "blasphemous," and "as foul and filthy a concoction as has ever been allowed to disgrace" the theatre. While newspapers attacked Ibsen for openly discussing venereal disease onstage, they dared not address the play's truly shocking revelation that a young man is in love with his half-sister.

While Ghosts is steeped in the imagery of disease, Ibsen was far more concerned with the ethical diseases of a society unwilling or unable to deal with the darker side of human nature. He turned to pollution as a metaphor for this same social corruption in his next play An Enemy of the People. By turns comic and tragic, the play shows a doctor hailed as a savior when he reveals that pollution is tainting the town's water. Once it becomes apparent that news of the contamination could hurt the town's reputation as a tourist destination, however, the citizens turn on him and his family, trying to drive them from their home. Many critics have taken the play as a response to criticism of Ghosts, but Ibsen's wide-ranging critique of democratic societies transcends any particular feuds over plays or pollution.

The next four plays of Ibsen, The Wild Duck, Rosmersholm, The Lady from the Sea, and Hedda Gabler, have even more complex characters. The psychological realism with which he portrays people can be painful to watch. Hedda Gabler, which Ibsen completed in 1890, pushes Realism to its limits, placing onstage not just a couple of historians, but seemingly the forces that drive history as well. The plot of the play revolves in part around a book about the future, and in Ibsen's later plays, he reached out toward the future of art, ultimately moving beyond the Realism he had helped to establish. Even the solidly realistic plays of Ibsen were too much for many professional theatres to take, and to perform them, sympathetic artist had to find a whole new way of staging plays.

The Independent Theatre Movement

Theatre was particularly stultified in France during the latter half of nineteenth century. The official state theatre, the Comédie Française, kept its stranglehold on serious drama, while the popular houses, known as boulevard theatres, stuck to maudlin melodramas and light-weight farces. These included the works of Georges Feydeau, who in 1882 had his first big hit with the farce Through the Window, and would later pen such classic comedies as A Flea in Her Ear. Paris had a number of small amateur theatre groups, however, some of which did quite fine work. In 1887, an obscure clerk named André Antoine quit his amateur theatre troupe because it wouldn't produce a play he wanted it to do. French theatre would never be the same.

Antoine founded his own theatre, known as the Théâtre Libre, which was open only to audiences who signed up for a special subscription. By organizing his theatre as a private club, Antoine avoided censorship laws. He immediately began staging important new plays, including The Power of Darkness by the Russian novelist Leo Tolstoy. After seeing the Meiningen Ensemble, he made his productions increasingly realistic. In 1890, he put on Ibsen's Ghosts, and the following year The Wild Duck. Critics flocked to see his productions, and word quickly spread about the bold new style Antoine championed.

In addition to performing Realist works, the Théâtre Libre became known for championing an even more extreme style known as Naturalism. The novelist Émile Zola considered Naturalism to be a scientific approach to literature that focused on heredity, environment, and the most basic impulses of human beings. Zola adapted his own novel Therese Raquin as a play in 1873, and Antoine later staged numerous adaptations of Zola's work at the Théâtre Libre. More gifted as a playwright than Zola was the Swedish writer August Strindberg. After writing his first great Naturalist play, The Father, Strindberg set to work on a new play with Antoine's theatre specifically in mind. Antoine did in fact later stage that play, Miss Julie, which became a classic due to its fierce and uncompromising portrayal of two people caught up in a ferocious downward spiral of sex and violence.

Companies all over Europe tried to reproduce the success of Antoine's Théâtre Libre. Strindberg himself founded the short-lived Scandinavian Experimental Theatre, together with his first wife, the actress Siri von Essen. In 1889, the theatre put on Miss Julie with von Essen in the title role. With this new theatre in mind, Strindberg wrote the short play The Stronger, which was intended to be a vehicle for his wife. Unfortunately, neither the theatre nor the marriage lasted long thereafter.

The same year Strindberg premiered Miss Julie, another independent theatre was founded in Berlin. German theatre artists who worked all over the city came together on Sundays, when they had the day off from more official theatres, so they could put on the types of plays they really wanted to perform. The theatre was known as the Freie Bühne--German for "Free Stage"--and operated as a democratic collective, though its first president, Otto Brahm, helped to guide it for years. The company performed the plays of Ibsen, as well as those of the German Naturalist playwright Gerhart Hauptmann. Hauptmann is best known for The Weavers, which told the true story of a labor uprising that had happened during the Industrial Revolution.

Britain took more time to open up to this new way of staging plays, but in 1891 the drama critic Jacob Grein founded the Independent Theatre Society, which brought Antoine's subscription model to London. Free of censorship laws, the new society opened with a production of Ghosts. Grein asked his fellow critic George Bernard Shaw, who was famous for mocking the popular plays of the London stage, to provide one of his own works for the society. Shaw obliged him with Widowers Houses, a play that examines the issue of slum landlords in a way that implicates nearly everyone as part of the problem. As if that weren't enough, Shaw followed the play up with Mrs. Warren's Profession, a play about both prostitution and feminism, and Arms and the Man, which attacked romanticized notions of war.

Over his long career, Shaw would go on to write clever comedies (You Never Can Tell, Major Barbara, Pygmalion), historical dramas (The Devil's Disciple, Caesar and Cleopatra, Saint Joan), and highly philosophical plays (Man and Superman, Heartbreak House, Back to Methuselah). His immense popularity showed that the new theatre that had begun on small, independent stages had now become mainstream. Realism became the style of the establishment, and new rebels would rise up against it, demanding new forms. Even as these new revolts were stirring, two men on the other side of Europe were creating what would become the single most influential theatre for the next hundred years. The men were Constantin Stanislavski and Vladimir Nemirovich-Danchenko, and the company they founded in 1898 was The Moscow Art Theatre.

Stanislavski and Nemirovich-Danchenko were both committed to an unprecedented devotion to Realism down to the smallest detail. Their first big hit at the Moscow Art Theatre was The Seagull, a play by Anton Chekhov that had previously flopped. Under the direction of Stanislavski, however, the play was a triumph. Stanislavski continued to both direct and act in Chekhov's future works, including Uncle Vanya, The Three Sisters, and The Cherry Orchard. Though Chekhov saw all of these plays as comedies, Stanislavski directed them with an intense earnestness.

After the Russian Revolution, Stanislavski published many of his thoughts on acting and traveled widely, sharing his technique with actors and directors around the world. His teachings, particularly as recorded in the book An Actor Prepares, became a new standard for acting all over the world. Stanislavski's Realist method became known simply as "the method." Realism, seemingly, had triumphed.